Crossing in Time: The First Disaster is D. L. Orton’s first book in the Between Two Evils series.
In short, Isabelle needs to go back in time to rescue her failed relationship with Diego to save the world. It’s not difficult to see where Crossing in Time has its two focuses; a science fiction element encompassing time travel, and the relationship between Isabelle and Diego.
We’re not allowed to judge a book by its cover, but I’ll give a brief heads-up to the chapter header pages; some think the following might be a small point but I like it; they have a hand drawn picture on them which is slightly descriptive (as is the chapter title) and helps to give the book a feel of real craftsmanship.
There’s also an indication of the subject of the first person who varies between three or four main characters. It’s sort of obvious from the reading, but the chapter heading makes it clear right from the start and you can get straight into the mindset of the first person character without that frustrating initial who is this? moment.
D. L. Orton is clearly well versed in science fiction from literature and movies, and this percolates throughout the novel. This comes in the form of various quotes and references or parallels drawn in similar circumstances, and again makes me feel that I’m reading a well crafted product.
Woven within the plot itself is subtle humour; it’s really well done because it doesn’t negate or lower the tone which D. L. Orton has skillfully set into place, but enhances feelings and emotions felt by the characters. This isn’t a comedy novel, rather comedy is used as a tool within it.
In addition to the scientific placing and the developed characters, there’s the shifting point of view with multiple first person characters who give differing angles and views on events (and other characters). The final concoction is a well thought out novel with interesting characters, situations and a fascinating underlying plot!
There are some brilliant time travel and related science fiction ideas in Crossing in Time. At times though I felt that they could have been introduced or explained a little more instead of simply mentioned in passing. It’s not that it was too complicated; I just thought there were some missed opportunities to expand on some fantastic ideas where other areas of the novel seemed to attract a huge amount of (unnecessary) attention.
Diego is the first to time travel. Actually this is after much testing – though some may argue not enough! 😉 A team of scientists develops theories into the worlds of parallel universes and time lines, as well as instrumentation such as peepers to gain insights into them.
Through these scientific tests and discussions over the results we learn more behind the mechanics of the time travel element. The ubiquitous bureaucracy, red tape and village idiots inject a certain amount of realism and credibility to the saga.
Whereas Diego’s trip in time has huge question marks hanging over it, things are a bit clearer for Isabelle, and indeed we follow Isabelle back in time to when she was with Diego in their early years together. Isabelle now has a younger body back in this history, that is to say, a body commensurate with the date. I immediately questioned whether she’d taken her old self’s place, or whether she was a second version, and if so, where was the ‘original’? Just as I was starting to think a hole was developing, clarity came in the text!
Actually, this happens quite frequently in Crossing in Time – I’d think there was a discrepancy or something vital missing only to read the explanation moments later. Note this is just me – it’s my own weakness that I ask too many questions, and in this case, I slowly learned that D. L. Orton would answer my questions at the proper time!
Isabelle and Diego
I’m giving this a separate section as it’s an important part of the novel, though I’ve only got three main things to say about it.
Apart from these observations, I can’t think of much else to say about it. Just lovey dovey stuff and erotica.
D.L. Orton ‘warned’ me beforehand that there was erotica in Crossing in Time and was curious to know what I thought about it from a male perspective. That comes as a relief, because for me to give a female perspective would be either impossible or painful. So here it is.
I didn’t like it.
To be honest it wasn’t as explicit as I was expecting, in fact it struck me as being done quite tastefully, but yes, it was graphic.
I’ve nothing against erotica being in a novel – it’s what couples do. We also wait for buses and do the laundry but the point is that I’m just not interested in reading about it. Isabelle and Diego may as well have planted some grass seeds and watched them grow, or painted walls and watched them dry. So what?
In fairness to them, sex seems to be the crux behind their relationship (see last bullet point above) and of course that’s up to them, but that’s not really my issue.
But that’s just subjective personal preference. My main gripe in its inclusion isn’t the content. It’s how it drags on and on, adding nothing to depth of character (please don’t take that the wrong way…) or obstinately not taking the plot forwards. I simply felt awkward reading it (for the reasons I mentioned above) and I gained nothing for it 🙁
A volcano with no eruption
Crossing in Time is not self complete. Perhaps this is an unfair thing to comment on in a review of a book which quite clearly says “Book 1” on the cover, but I feel especially cheated because for the last quarter of the novel I was wasting my time reading about the the physical relationship whilst the plot stagnated.
I was reminded of a recent visit to Mount Etna.
Flashback: A little while ago I went on an organised tour up Mount Etna. It was a really early start (4:15 am) and on the way we stopped for a bite to eat. It took 3 hours. We also stopped off to be pressured into buying some tourist crap. For an hour.
Eventually we got to Mount Etna and took a cable car to take us 500 m higher. Excellent stuff! At the top were off road vehicles which could take us right to the smoking rumbling crater rim; the stuff we’d come for!
But we’d arrived at the site too late; there was only half an hour before the last cable car left to take us back down. I was gutted. The whole purpose of the trip was to get to the top of an active volcano but too much time was wasted beforehand. Instead we could only rumble around the barren rocky landscape.
And it’s the same with this novel. Pages and pages of leg caressing and touching inner thighs…and then…the book ends. There’s no off-roader to move the story line on.
So is this a teaser for Book 2? Maybe, but I’d fear that Book 2, and subsequent books until the last one, will end similarly.
But the story line is strong and ultimately I’d love to read the whole series to see how it pans out.
A little while ago a friend asked whether I read predominantly male written books, or female. I’d never really thought about it before; to be honest I go straight for the book descriptions and things. Judging a book by it’s cover is quoted for being bad, judging one by the sex of its author I think is insane.
But that said…it turns out that most books on my read list are written by men. That’s not me deliberately picking out male books, and equally I hope that it’s not that I have a natural preference for male written books. Or come to think of it, I hope it’s also that there aren’t enough science fiction books out there written by women (or girls).
So somehow that makes Crossing in Time special in that somehow it’s made its way from the mind of a female author through my eyeballs and onto my retina, tumbling into my brain and providing me with much enjoyment.
Because it’s written by a woman?
No. Because it’s a great novel with some brilliant science fiction written against a knowledgeable (and humourous) backdrop!
Rating * * * *
Crossing in Time has a foot in two camps – romance (actually, sexual attraction) and science fiction. The trouble is that almost literally the legs are split too far between these camps.
The story line is strong and engaging, and there’s a wealth of juicy time travel ideas and gadgetry in there. I’d love to read the whole series, so for these reasons I’m giving Crossing in Time 4 stars, loosing a star due to the prolonged and unnecessary slushy stuff. I’m cautious though, because focusing on this single book is like judging a meal by the way the waitress walks when she brings you the starter.
(And in this case, the waitress wrote the menu pretty well too! 😉 )
Read my interview with Deb on Time Travel Nexus where she shares her thoughts on her writing process, inspiration, relationships…and molluscs!
If you enjoyed this post, you might like to visit or like time2timetravel on Facebook
Disclaimer: A copy of “Crossing in Time” was sent to me free of charge to read and review. This it!
| 5* Excellent! | 4* Good | 3* OK | 2* Not good | 1* Crud |
I apologize for the delayed response to your insightful and well-considered review. I wanted to let the time machine cool down before jumping back into the fray (you know how finicky the GrillMaster can be).
I’m so glad you enjoyed the chapter images. As far as I know, you are the first to comment on (or perhaps even notice) them! I’m embarrassed to admit how many hours I spent trying to come up with clever chapter titles to fit the eclectic images the artist dreamt up. (Man oh man is that laundry piling up. Where does the time go?)
I must admit that there was quite a bit more physics (quantum mechanics and even some string theory) in the first draft I sent to my editor, but he wisely suggested that I spread out the science to all five books (instead of dumping it all in the first one). Still, I knew that hard science fiction fans (we may be the last two?) were going to be wanting more, and I do hope to satisfy you (and me) by the end of the series. I know trust is a difficult thing, but I’m hoping you’ll give me time to prove I’m up to the challenge.
Now to the volcano issues (despite your metaphor, it would seem I blew it!): sex, story line, and author sex 😉
This novel is centered on Isabel. It’s her book, her story, her transformation — and at the end, she dies. (Your interpretation may be different, and that’s as it should be: ambiguous. Life is like that.) I was hoping her death would be enough to close the story (for now), but it’s all just a grand experiment (and I’m certain I’ve gotten some things wrong). I did hope you’d want to know more about Diego, Matt, Dave, and Tego, and I could definitely have written a whole other book on them… wait a sec… I DID write a book on them. Book 2 follows Diego (and tells his story) and book 3 comes back to Tego (and if you think Isabel can be a pain in the butt, wait until to you meet her stunt double in Tego’s world). Of course Dave (think evil Elon Musk) and Matt (British Neil deGrasse Tyson) get their moment in the spotlight for book 4, and I plan to tie up all (!) those loose ends in the final book (including the Panama Hat Guy, lol). (Man, I better get back to writing before we all drown in dirty laundry.)
Regarding the writer’s gender: There’s a website where you can type in (or paste in) a few pages of writing, and the algorithm will use metrics to determine if the sample was written by a man or a woman (http://www.hackerfactor.com/GenderGuesser.php#Analyze for those with a need to know). I stuck in the prologue from CIT and was informed that my writing is MALE (by a pretty large margin as it turns out: 68%. Mark Twain scores: 54%). I also put in the text of your review, and got your writing gender (male by 60%. I had you worried there for a moment, no? 🙂 It’s unfortunate that people assume that men write better than women. I hope to change a few minds. (And now you know why I use my initials.)
And finally, let’s talk about sex. (I know, I know. You think I overdid it already, but bare 😉 with me… ) I think great sex is the most important (and enduring) element in a successful (and satisfying) long-term relationship, and there’s lots of research to back me up. (Those who can make it last in bed, know how to make the rest of the relationship last too.) Unfortunately, lots of people (BOTH men and women) seem confused about what women (should or do) want (or even where to start). Just take a look at how well books sell that contain idiot women and impossibly perfect men (Fifty Shades of Grey anyone?) and look at the popularity of porn websites (the single most-important feature of the male actors is the size of their member. Eye roll.)
The steamy parts of the novel were my attempt to rail against the (porn and clueless romance) machine. The men in my book are not super-human, the women are not ditzes, and the sex is not written from the “dominant male calls the shots while the emaciated, bleached-blond “girl” screams and comes over and over (through pounding sex)” script (which we see in both romance AND porn.) Okay, I’m done. I wish I was better at weaving the sex into the story so that it didn’t make you uncomfortable and embarrassed. Something to aspire to in the next book. Maybe I need to spend more time writing about laundry?
In any case, thanks for reading and writing such a great review (and I hope your volcano is okay. 😉